Drumwaster's Rants

May 2004
S M T W T F S
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

Members:

Login | Register | Member List

Search


Advanced Search

tracker

Archives

July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003

Category Archives

Recent entries

LA Times: Inmates With Life Sentences Should Receive Parole
Q’ing in the Hood
Timetable for Reversal
The Evil Meter
Rockets Red Glare
O-bortion!
Happy Independence Day!
The “New” Old Battlefield
The Fall of the Old Grey Lady
McCain’s Greatest Hope Was Also Bush’s

Categories

Syndicate

RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
Atom

All e-mail submissions and comments are subject to publication or parody at the sole discretion of the authors of this site, unless prior arrangements have been made.

Take the MIT Weblog Survey




For every problem, there is one solution which is simple, neat and wrong. -- Henry Louis Mencken


Friday, May 07, 2004


The Liberal Bill of Rights

Some superlative work by Christopher Kallini (including some recent updating) gives us the Liberal Bill of Rights. Rather, the Bill of Rights as they would be if they had been written by the modern Democratic Party.

Shamelessly stolen from, and with much thanks to, Kevin’s Mind for reposting it.


Posted by Drumwaster at 07:39 PM | (1) Trackbacks
Category:

I am going to disagree….

...with the venerable Steve of Norway, and the highly-respected Dr. Drumwaster. 

Bush was right, and Rumsfeld was as well.  An apology was a good idea. 

Why?  Please read below.


Posted by John Cross at 12:20 PM | (0) Trackbacks
Category:

Why us?

Is there some reason why this country has some obsession in regards to apologizing? Our leaders feel the need to apologize for past events, and current events as well.

Funny thing is, I’ve never heard a terrorist say “I’m sorry.” Nor have I heard foreign leaders apologize to us for their wrongs. Never really have heard communists apologize for their mass-starvations or to own up to the fact their economic model is total BS. When is the last time anyone from the United Nations apologized for their pathetic record? Why does the burden of contrition always seem to fall on us?

Once, just once, I’d be happy to get an “Attaboy USA!” or “Great job America!”

For a country that has only been around for 228 years or so, we sure seem to think we’re awful. Then again, that mostly comes from the left, the originators of the self-loathing American model.

Posted by Drumwaster at 11:08 AM | (0) Trackbacks
Category:

One last bit of proof

The Democrats have lost no opportunity to paint Bush and Rumsfeld with the broadest brush they could in this latest scandal of the troops, with asshats like Charlie Rangel and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi demanding that Rumsfeld resign. And John “Admitted War Criminal” Kerry lost no time in bashing Bush while reminding us that he served in Vietnam (you had heard that, hadn’t you?).

Good for them. Republicans decided to go one better and announce that they were proposing a House Resolution, condemning the behavior. Simple enough, right? Maybe not. Let’s read it:

H.RES.628
Title: Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 627) deploring the abuse of persons in United States custody in Iraq, regardless of the circumstances of their detention, urging the Secretary of the Army to bring to swift justice any member of the Armed Forces who has violated the Uniform Code of Military Justice, expressing the deep appreciation of the Nation to the courageous and honorable members of the Armed Forces who have selflessly served, or are currently serving, in Operation Iraqi Freedom, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Rep Hastings, Doc [WA-4] (introduced 5/5/2004)

Seems fairly straightforward, doesn’t it? Seems like the Dems would absolutely POUNCE on this one, doesn’t it? It condemns the bad ones, and praises the good ones, so the Dems should be almost unanimously in favor, shouldn’t they?

Yeah, it seems that way…

Then why didn’t a single House Democrat vote for it? Not one. The final result was 218-201 (with 14 not voting).

For those of you who aren’t fully aware of it, these kind of resolutions are non-binding, and exist just to express the “Sense of the House”. The Senate isn’t even consulted, because this isn’t a law, nor does it require any action on any Branch or Department.

Voting in favor would cost the Dems absolutely nothing, and allow them to put their accusations on the official record. But they didn’t.

I’m just stunned. Not that the Dems are hypocrites, but that they would admit it so conclusively.

Posted by Drumwaster at 07:11 AM | (0) Trackbacks
Category: Asshats |

Bush needs to apologize!

Again and again and again...oh, in other news, 288,000 new jobs were created in April.

What a terrible economy we’ve got going right now...absolutely terrible, eh John Kerry?

Posted by Drumwaster at 05:40 AM | (0) Trackbacks
Category:
Page 1 of 1 pages