A fanatic is someone who can't change his mind, but won't change the subject. -- Winston Churchill
Friday, September 03, 2004
An interesting question
Given that TIME Magazine has given Bush a double-digit lead in its most recent poll (52%-41%-3%, for Bush, Kerry, and Nader, respectively), we can start to accept that there is a VERY strong probability that Bush will be re-elected.
That leads us to an interesting situation. Bush will be a two-term POTUS, and when his term expires in ‘08, it seems unlikely to the point of “impossible” that Cheney will be the heir apparent, for health reasons, if nothing else.
Jeb is not the statesman his brother is. Giuliani can give a great speech, but there are character issues (let’s be honest). Ah-nuld is Constitutionally ineligible (Article II, Section 1). Mitt Romney might be a Republican, but he’s from Massachusetts, and people are going to be sick of that state (no offense, Deb!). Colin Powell is too liberal for the party faithful, but maybe…
I know it’s a little early to start thinking about it (the Convention hasn’t even finished cleaning up yet!), but who would be a strong contender?
Condi? Rumsfeld? Who would you want to run?
Posted by
Drumwaster at
05:13 PM |
(0)
Trackbacks
Category:
Best wishes for a speedy recovery
For those who hadn’t heard, for President Bill Clinton has entered the hospital for heart bypass surgery.
Speaking on behalf of all of us here at Drumwaster’s Rants, we wish to express our hopes for a safe and speedy recovery. (Hey, we may disagree with his politics, his honesty, his judgment, his actions, his attitudes and all the rest, but that doesn’t mean that we wish him any physical suffering.)
Posted by
Drumwaster at
01:01 PM |
(0)
Trackbacks
Category:
Haven’t had a chance to write about this yet
But Holy Sh*t!
I ran across this story over at Fark earlier, and I can only stare slack-jawed at how far and fast computers have come during those early days of monochrome screens (either ugly amber or eye-straining green) and 300 baud modems.
Money quote:
The team, which included folks from AMD, Cisco, Microsoft Research, Newisys, and S2io, transferred 859 gigabytes of data in less than 17 minutes. It did so at a rate of 6.63 gigabits per second between the CERN facility in Geneva, Switzerland, and Caltech in Pasadena, Calif., a distance of more than 15,766 kilometers, or approximately 9,800 miles.
***
This record speed of 6.63Gbps is equivalent to transferring a full-length DVD movie in four seconds.
Wow. I remember when I thought that a Megabyte of HDD storage was impressive.
Yet Another Update
Welp,
I spent yesterday awaiting the results of the biopsy and the wait was apparently in vain because I got the results today (and people ask me why I don’t like doctors). The mass is benign, just a collection of cells that shouldn’t be where they are. So, I have two choices: One, medication to get rid of it, apparently there are drug treatments out there that have come along in the past 5 years or so that can be used in cases such as mine. Or, two I have it removed via surgery. The surgeons pushed the surgery angle (naturally) since there is a remote chance the tumor can turn malignant, and it is one they are not willing to accept. My regular doctor along with the neurologist want to try to treat it medically first to see if it responds to drug therapy.
Of course there is always the third choice. Let sleeping dogs lie and just deal with it.
Posted by
Kevin at
12:37 PM |
(0)
Trackbacks
Category:
One surprise, and my take…
First...surprise....Andrew Sullivan has come to the hard, painful conclusion that he cannot support the President.
I’m shocked.....shocked, I tell you! This is the biggest surprise since, well, the sun came up yesterday morning.
Now....my take on Bush’s speech.
Obviously, like every other speech at this convention (save Zell Miller’s effort, which was a throwback to the political speeches of two generations ago), Bush started out slow, and got better as the speech went on.
It’s hard to fully explain a long-range domestic plan in 28 minutes...knowing this, I buried my Vodkapundit-like impatience for the foreign policy part of the speech. I knew it would come, and I knew it would be the better part of the speech (Bush has his calling in the War on Terror, and it shows), but he had to address the domestic issues. They really had not been addressed in the Convention by any of the front-line speakers, so if fell to the President to do so.
He did well. Other than the inherent difficulties in mixing his obvious federalist streak and moderate governance, he explained his ideas, plans, and positions well. It comes across rather plainly that Bush isn’t a libertarian, much to the chagrin of the Far Right, but he is undoubtedly more conservative than John Kerry.
It’s also clear that the domestic agenda that Bush has is not substantially different than the one he wished to implement in 2000....health care savings accounts, allowing people to invest part of their Social Security taxes into a retirement acount of their choosing, education reform, and lowering the tax burden. He has his ideas about how things should work, and how things can be, and it is clear that the War On Terror disrupted much of what he wanted to do. Those people that are critical of Bush’s economic policies tend to ignore that little fact. The financial hit we took as a result of 9-11 changed a lot of things, and caused the budgetary crisis we are in right now (the numbers noted int he aforementioned article are comperable to the deficits of this year and 2003...combined). He passed No Child Left Behind, and two rounds of tax cuts. That’s about it, save for the FMA. I’m not counting the Patriot Act ot Dept. of Homeland Security, because they would not have existed except for 9-11.
Bush spent a bit less than half (by my unempirical measure) of his speech on domestic issues not related to the War. Then, he moved on.
It is crystal clear that the President views the War on Terror as our calling...our mission to promote liberty and free the oppressed, and that this is the mission he was put into the Presidency for. Therefore, the speech got better, and really started to flow. He spoke more from the heart than from the teleprompter, and his emotional reprisal of his meeting with parents of dead soldiers probably elicited tears from every state in the Union. He does feel this calling, deep within his soul.
One of the things that people don’t like in Bush is his bluntness and directness. Call it a lack of nuance, if you wish, but the fact is that Bush is absolutely perfect as a war president. Americans don’t want sugar coating anymore....we got a cigarful of it in the 90’s (as did others), and we figured out that there was no further use for it after 9-11. Bush, the Peace President, would not be as effective...he is a guy, to be truthful, that needs a crisis in order to shine. Bill Clinton did not do well when crises rose, and neither did Carter, but Bush Sr. did, and so did Reagan. Bush found himself on 9-11, and his true spirit and force of character burst forth. It showed last night. All things considered, Kerry would be the wrong guy to be in at this time in history. That also showed.
That feeling that eminates from Bush is the salve on his current term. I am a conservative, and, if Joe Lieberman were running in Kerry’s stead, and if there were no WoT, I would strongly consider voting for him. Bush isn’t as far to the right as I am, but, my God, all the domestic policies that all the candidates have voiced would be worthless without the American people feeling secure in their leader’s ability to defend their country. Bush has worked hard, and long, to make America secure. That puts him over any other candidate, and I know that many millions of Americans will vote for him according to that fact.
So....I score his first 20 minutes as a B-, the next 20 as a B, and the end as a A+. He did very well, delivering above what he had to do. Good job, Mr. President.
Comment freely. Time for me to get to work.
Less...
Posted by
John Cross at
06:37 AM |
(0)
Trackbacks
Category:
Page 1 of 1 pages