They couldn't hit an elephant at this dist... -- Last words of General John B. Sedgwick, Battle of Spotsylvania, 09 May 1864
Tuesday, January 31, 2006
The State of The Union--Liveblogging from Drumwaster’s Rants
Well...it’s 8:41 PM, and I’m getting things ready for the liveblogging. Two short thoughts that I wanted to share.
(NOTE: The bulk of the liveblogging post has been moved below the fold. Hit the “Read More” icon to, well, read more.)
First, that this POTUS is great at giving relatively short speeches....his predecessor was so f-ing long winded, I could never do this. Secondly, I’ve been watching an A&E special on Flight 11 (Atta’s plane on 9-11) and it’s putting me in a mood that will not serve liberals well.
The beer is Michalob Ultra. I’ll post here, then back up the liveblogging commentary into the ‘Read More’ zone. Updates will hopefully be timestamped...depends on how fast the President speaks.
I’m going to listen to the speech on streaming audio (610 WTVN)....maybe catch it via video over C-Span, if I’m lucky.
8:45--looks like the video feed is working OK....I have the TV as a backup, though. Beer time. If you want to make a comment, I will be sure to check those and post them as I can, or answer them if I need to. I also put out e-mails to Polipundit, Glenn Reynolds, Michelle Malkin, Ed Morrissey, and John Hawkins. Let’s see if they can be so kind as to send a few readers our way.
8:52--Oh, Yeah, Michelle Malkin comes through huge!!!! Smart, Classy Conservative.
8:54: Some quick thoughts. GWB has to come in here and be clear, plain, and optimistic. He seems to get better in these situations....usually right when he needs to. A clutch hitter is what they call that. He needs to come out firm on Iran (and informative on Iran....tell us why they are a threat, and what his plan is), he needs to give us an update on Iraq, what is going right in the War on Terror, and how the economy is. Other than that, I would really like to see the fiscal conservative make a showing tonight....we need controls put on spending, and he needs to take the lead....because his conservative base is pretty darn tired of the spending.
8:58: The cohort of reps and senators that will be escorting the President in is being introduced....why? Is this a pat on the back?
More thoughts.....yeah, conservative governance, strong military, and firm plans for the coming year. GWB is leaning precariously close to beconming another 2nd Term lame duck...he needs to get his political feet back underneath him, and tonight can go a long way towards doing that.
9:01--Here come the Justices of SCOTUS....who’s the new guy with the glasses? Heh......is John Kerry applauding? In fact, it looked as if 30% of the room was standing shock still......
9:05--Come on, people, quit glad-handing and have a seat.
9:08--Here comes the President. Ijust read over at Captain’s Quarters that Cindy Sheehan is in attendance? I also read there that she was arrested. ??? Anyone out there that can confirm or deny that she was arrested? I know she’s at the SOTU. All the way from Venezuela......
9:10--Blue tie....calm strength. As always. This guy has a lot of blue ties. At 9:11, the President asks Hastart to hit the gavel, and he does...if only to get another round of applause going.....
9:12--First off...Coretta Scott King tribute. Saw that coming. Good applause for that.
9:14--Addressing the tone in Washington. “Tonight, the State of the Union is strong, and we will keep it strong together.” Now, listing the choices between moving forward, and retreating. Protectionism and reactivity leads to decline, so we must continue to lead.
9:15--Now describing the reasons behind terrorist attacks, and how dictatorships aid terrorisms. In 1945, there were two dozen democracies, and now there are 122. Mentioning elections in Lebanon, Egypt, Iraq and Afghanistan. Mentions Syria, Iran, N. Korea, and Burma by name as dictatorships.
9:17--Moves onto radical Islam. Calls OBL a ‘character’, and speaks about their aims. Talks about terrorists using fear via beheadings and bombings. They have miscalculated. We love our freedom, and we will fight to keep it.
9:19--We cannot find security in retreating to our own country. The battle would follow us here. If we leave the world to fend for itself, we show everyone that we do not believe in the ideals we expose. we will never retreat, and never surrender to evil. I guess Murtha’s been addressed....America rejects the false security of isolationism. we are responding to the historical call to liberate the oppressed. We are on the offensive against terror, in Afghanistan and Iraq. We are helping Iraq biuld a representative government, rebuilding the economy and infrastructure, and training the Iraqis. we are proud to be their allies in the cause of freedom.
9:22--Iraq has gone from tyranny to a constitutional government in three years. We are winning, and we are in this fight to win. As usual, GWB is best on the foreign policy/WoT items so far.
9:24--This road to victory is our road home. Those decisions will be made by our military leaders, not by poiticians in DC. Another glaning shot at Murtha. We have adjusted our strategy, and listened to advice from all sides. There is a difference in defeatism and advice. Second guessing and defeatism are not sound strategies to win. People should speak in candor, but withdrawal would be a disaster for Iraq and Afghanistan. However we feel about this war, we must keep our word, finish the job, and stand behind our military. Direct hit on the Murthanites and defeatists.
9:26: Marine SSGT Dan Clay: “I know what honor is.....it has been an honor to serve and protect all of you.....don’t hesitate to honor those who protect what is worth protecting.” His mom, dad, and sister are there. GWB is choked up. Note Laura and an Iraqi woman that are there in front of the family.
9:27--We are grateful to all the miltary personnel, and we should remember the sacrifice of the military families.
9:28--Best way to end terror is to spread liberty and representative governments. Elected governments need to must work for stability for those who put them into office. Refers to Hamas and Palestine....says Hamas must recognize Israel and must begin true negotiations. Moves on to explain that Middle Eastern democracy will be different than ours, but it is still the only way they will be able to move forward.
9:30--Iran now....the nations ofthe world must not let Iran gain nuclear weapons. Finally, we are moving towards a full explanation of his Iranian policy. People of Iran....we respect you, and your freedom. We look forward to the day where we can be friends with a democratic Iran. That’s it? Looks like GWB is going to stand fast on this....he’s guarding his flanks on the Iran issue.
9:32--Moving on to helping those poor in other parts of the world, and Bush is tying it in to isolationism, and how isolationism will hurt people around the world by stifling our ability and presence. He is moving on to the Patriot Act via a segue into first responders and fighting terror at home. Now, he is moving on to the wire-tapping situation....he has authorized the program to monitor calls out to foreign terrorists. This has been cleared by lawyers, and members of Congress were debriefed. The program has helped. We need to know if people in this country are speaking to terrorists, so we don’t get hit again.
9:36--We cannot withdrawal from our international leadership. Presidents of the past recognized this. In this war, presidents of the present and future must have the backing of Congress. Bush asks the Congress to stand with him as America fights terrorism and leads the world in this war.
9:38--Now to the economy. Our economy has produced more jobs in the laast 4 years than Japan and the EU combined. We are growing, but we can’t get complacent. People that say that we should isolate ourselves, or make the government take a larger role, are wrong. people that stand against immigration are wrong. These are forms of economic retreat...Bush has a better path. Americans should not fear their economic future. We should grow our economy. The tax relief we passed has put $881 billion back in the hands of the citizens. This relief is posed to expire. If it does, it will be like a large tax increase. Make the tax cuts permanent.
9:41--The budget will cut 140 bad or underperforming programs The deficit will be cut in half by 2009 (not enough....ed. note) Now to earmark reform. Way to address this? Pass the line item veto.....if only he’d use it......
9:42--Mandatory spending cuts. Baby Boomer retirement (great joke there about him and Clinton). The benefits to them will equal 60% of the budget. Congress did not act to save Social Security (cheers from Democrats...even that sounded weak as water) and the situation is doing nothing but getting worse. We need to form a commission and offer bipartisan solutions. Put aside partisanship and solve this problem. Boy, the Dems looked bad there.....sheesh...and a commission? Proof that the Prez got beat the heck up on this last year.
9:44--To remain competative, we need to keep markets open. Free markets. Moving to immigration. We need a policy that benefits America, and the economy. We need safer and better defenders. We need a visa and amnesty program that is humane. Weak cheers for that.
9:46--We need to make sure we have health care for those who cannot afford it. We will make the system more responsive via tech and streamlining. We will work on improving medical savings accounts. He asks for Congress to pass medical liability reform this year.
9:48--America is addicted to oil. Best way to break this addiction is technology. We are on the threshold of great advancements. 22% increase in Dept. of Energy research $$...pushing alternatives to oil-based energy. More research for hydrogen, ethanol, and make it (ethanol) practical within 6 years. Goal is to reduce oil imports by 75%, and make our dependance on Middle eastern oil a thing of the past. Sounds pretty confident.
9:50--American Competitiveness Initiative, to keep us competitive in education and progress. Double $$ for sciences (nanotechnology, for example). Tax credits for scientific development and innovation. That makes sense in a capitalist society..pay people for their invention. Children need to be pushed towards the sciences....classes need to be rigorus and challenging. If we insure that our children succeed in life, they will insure that we succeed in the world.
9:53--American greatness is not only measured in what we have, but by how we treat each other. Welfare cases have dropped by 50%. Teenage births have been falling for 12 years on a row. There is a quiet trend here...a rise of personal conscience. Everyone here has a right to be proud of this record.
9:54--A little note: This SOTU is all about America engagement and leadership.
9:56: We have proven the pessimists wrong before, and we will do it again. Courts need to deliver justice. Mentions Roberts and Alito....a little political nose-rubbing there. Good for him. Thanks the Senate for confirming them, and says he will continue nominating people that do not legislate from the bench. Pays tribute to Sandra Day O’Connor. Thanks.
9:57: Anti-cloning remarks.....obvious he sees it as abhorrent.
9:58: Now to ethical reform. We pledge to the people that we will behave ethically....we can never betray that trust.
10:00--Gets the plug in for his wife’s program for needy and uncared for children. Resources will be added so that kids stay in school.
10:01--$85 billion for New Orleans. WOW. However, we need to address problems that existed before the hurricane. As we recover, we need to work for the day where all Americans are protected equally by laws. Huh....I thought they were.
10:01--Bush asks Congress to renew the Ryan white Act for AIDS research. 50% of AIDS cases are from African Americans.
10:02--We are in the middle of a great battle. The destination of history is determined by human actions. Mentions Lincoln and MLK and WWII as points of history that people could have made decisions and settled for half. We will lead freedom’s advance. We move forward with optimism......God Bless America.
Now, I’m listening to Fox News, but here’s my take, and some notes on the Democratic response:
As usual, optimism and forward-looking prevailed. The theme was obviously “America: Engaged and Leading”. As usual, he was best on foreign policy, but committed to little where Iran was concerned....just that we stand with the Iranian people, and that he is going to go the UN route this time. Sometimes, I think that he is going this route only to show how worthless the UN is. His energy policy has turned around...he sees that ANWR and further oil from the Middle East is a pie-in-the-sky idea, and that we need another direction where oil and energy is concerned. This is energy policy is not new to this speech, but he expounded on what he had said before. That and programs for education and economic development.
In short, he was classic Bush. Strong on foreign policy, especially the War on Terror. Supportive of the Iranian people, and he calls the dictators around the world just that. Definite on tax cuts, free trade, and his economic vision. Basically, he said that people that oppose his engaging, internationally-leading ideas and ideals are isolationist and defeatist. That came through quite strongly.
What would I say about this? Well, it was well defined, strong and pretty uniform on those things he has supported. Also, it reflects the realities of the changing situation in America. We have to get away from oil...that wasn’t the situation in 1999. It looks like he was taking something off of the speech, especially in the domestic policies area.....not that he didn’t know what he was saying, but because he wanted to sound as if he wanted to work with the Democrats. Why. I don’t know
I don’t think he wants to. I think he will do what he thinks he should, as he has from the get-go.
In my ear, I am listening to the Democratic response. Talking about government delivering results. I haven’t heard a sound policy yet from them...a lot of bashing of the POTUS, and saying that there was a better way. No direction I can discern...not a single coherent point. If they win any seats this year in the House or Senate, it is because the GOP is worthless.
10:21--Mr. Kaine is now talking about the WoT. Are the President’s policies the right ones to win the war? We know the info given to the US was wrong. Now, he is lying about the body armor/vets benefits/...that meme is still alive. No...not lying. Just pushing the meme. Now, to energy, and the hearings to have the oil companies return their profits.....ah, the foul breath of socialism.
10:25--The administration is falling behind in environment, keeping jobs in America. These are federal failures. We need to focus on service and results. We need a change. Democrats are working to restore...what did he just say? That the Democrats are working to restore ethics and bipartisanship? Did this guy watch C-Span at all last week?
10:27--That guy sounded like a PBS narrator. Whoah......
It is clear that the Democrats are a bigger-government party than the Republicans are....this whole “the federal government is here to serve you’ is kind of troubling.....now, C-Span is interviewing Louise Slaughter, a Democrat. There is a deep, deep feeling there that they (the democrats and liberal Left) are isolated and that they have been personally expelled from the power structure. She said “Things aren’t like we want it..” or something like that three or four times. It is so “Us Vs. Them”, I am surprised they can get enough gumption to go vote....and she said that they only do that 6-8 days a month.
Well...let me put a few final thoughts out here...Bush has ideas and a vision, and the Democrats come off as just opposing him no matter what his decisions or plans are. Bush gave a B to B+ speech, but he stayed true to his worldview, which is still shaped by September 11th, 2001. Democrats stayed true to theirs, which was shaped on 11-7-2000. Their response was a C- at best.
Commentary welcome. THANKS FOR COMING!!!
Less...
Posted by
John Cross at
05:41 PM |
(0)
Trackbacks
Category:
Tonight, tonight, tonight……
OH, OOOHHHHH!!
Sorry, Mr. Collins.
Just a note to the regulars and to my blog boss...I’ll be live-blogging the SOTU (possibly beer-blogging the SOTU) tonight, and if you’d spread the word, it’d be nice.
See you around that time......
Posted by
John Cross at
10:41 AM |
(0)
Trackbacks
Category:
Monday, January 30, 2006
Random Constitutional Thoughts
I’m of the mindset that we should repeal the Seventeenth Amendment.
Y’see, back in the day, the Founders had seen what kind of problems could be developed through one branch abusing the other branches of government, so they decided on a separation of powers. The United States were a loosely confederated group of independent political entites. There were large states and small states heavily populated and sparsely populated, richer, poorer, whatever, but they were considered to be equal in the same sense that Portugal and the United States are considered to be equal. They had their strengths and weaknesses, their own state ruler and legislature, elected by the People, and the laws that they passed would only apply to that state.
That is why extradition of a criminal who is “on the lam” and gets caught in another state is a request and not an order.
Did you notice what I did above?
I said “The United States were...” That’s the plural form of that verb, and I used it because I was treating the United States as exactly that - united States. Each with their own interest in their relationship with the Federal Government, which was designed only to protect all of the States at once, preferring no one State over any other.
Moving on…
They drew their military from the various State militias, funding the Federal Army only as needed, they made sure that they kept their greedy paws out of the economies of neighboring States (by preventing the taxation of anything crossing a State line), and each State wanted its own say in the decisions reached by that Federal Government - a voice and a vote, as the parlance goes.
The most numerous branch of Congress is required to be elected by the people every two years, and each district would be based on population - every man had the same chance to express an opinion to that Representative. Those citizens were also electing their State governments to handle things on the State level.
The original intent of the Founding Fathers was to give the various legislatures the authority to send two of their own representatives into the “Upper House” (it was originally called that because they were representing the State as a whole, not just “The People").
If you could get both the directly-elected representatives and the upper-level (i.e., appointed by the State) to agree on legislation, that would certainly simplify the issues.
Look it up. Our government exploded right around the time that the Federal Government claimed authority over every dime earned within its borders (the 16th Amendment’s “income tax") and took authority out of the hands of the States (by the 17th Amendment).
And today, it isn’t “The United States are...”, it’s “The United States is...”
More’s the pity.
So, should we repeal the 17th Amendment?
Less...
Inter-Relationships
This probably piggy-backs on what the Venerable Drumwaster said just now....and it is reflective of other posts I have made on the subject...but can we revisit an inter-relationship that we should all keep in mind?
We see Cindy “It’s for my Son” Sheehan down in South America glad-handing and fondling the socialist dictator of Venezuela......Michelle “Erudite Babe of the Blogsphere” Malkin has a picture of this.
We have seen, through every peace protest pic-fest, socialist groups, Leninists, and Marxists plying their wares and blasting their hate-filled opinions about George W. McChimpyHalliburtonWarForOilBush.
And, I’ve said it here, and here, that this isn’t just a coincidence.
‘The enemy of my enemy is my friend.’
Communists and hard-line leftists want to see an end to free-markets. They want to see wealth redistributed. However, they know that we (the United States) will not allow it to happen. They know we will fight wars in order to maintain a globalized market economy, and to stop the forcible spread of socialism, Korea and Vietnam being two good examples.
And, the socialist-side lost. Their model was inferior. And, it still is.
Captialism, for all of the flaws it might have, is still the best way out of systemic poverty. Free markets also require a classic liberalism....an institutional freedom of word, practice, and business, all under a set of laws that protect those economic and econo-social liberties.
Chinese Communism is in a state of flux, with the last 15 years being a good example of that dictatorship moving hard against an undeniable shift towards economic freedom. The move is steady, and inevitable. It isn’t even a model for the socialists of the West anymore.
All that being said, the defeat of capitalism (and, therefore, the defeat of the United States and/or the crippling of our world standing) cannot occur at the hands of the socialist revolution. That has been rejected. Therefore, the Left has to find an ally.....and they have.
It is no coincidence that they are appearing at peace protests, and that they are supporting Islamofascists, even though these same Islamofascist detest them. It is because the enemy of the Islamofascists is capitalism and the United States. It is the same reason the Soviets built the military forces of Syria, and Iraq, and Egypt....because the capitalist, classically-liberal nation of Israel posed a threat to the fascist states of the region. Expansion of capitalism and free-market systems in that region threatened the totalitarian states that were there.....therefore, the Soviets came to the aid of the pro-fascist states there. Israel was, and is, a strong, liberal, capitalist state.
In addition, the Islamofascist have institutions that deter the kind of civil liberties that are required for long-term capitalist expansion. If such liberties were to be granted, most of the governments in the region would collapse, or would be overthrown peacefully via open elections. Therefore, they fear said liberties, and do not allow civil or economic liberties to spread to the people.
So, they oppose us, and, because they oppose us, the Leninists, Marxists, and modern-day Left oppose us as well. They are allied in a common goal...to weaken the influence of the United States, culturally, economically, and militarily.
That is why they comingle at these protest marches, and in front of repressed Venezuelans. That’s why you can find communist literature at pro-Palestinian demonstrations. Because they have made the devil’s agreement with each other....do not allow the United States to emerge from the War on Terror as they did the Cold War.
As a victor. As THE victor.
To each of these disparate groups, that would be a disservice to the world. That would re-install our model of limited government, federalist constitutionalism, rejection of autocracy, and economic freedom as the pre-eminent system....or, rather, example, since our model isn’t a system, it is based upon the wants and needs of an educated populace that demands a say in their governance.
That is what both of these groups fear, because with education and freedom, people reject Islamofascist autocracy and Stalinism.
So, Communism supports Islamofascism. Enemy of my Enemy.....
...and with that, if you click below, I want to give you my thoughts on Hamas and their win in ‘Palestine’.
Now, remember, I am coming to this with the opinion that there has never been, until the United States and Israel created it, a ‘state’ of Palestine. I’d love to debate that with someone.....but maybe another time. Either way, Palestine just went to the polls and elected themselves an Islamofasist government.
What I love are the people that are all upset about this.....that this is somehow a situation that The Bush Doctrine caused. Well, to them, I say the following:
No Shit. And, it’s a good thing.
What the Palestinian people have done is show the entire world how completely fucked up their situation is, and the true legacy of Islamofascism. Everyone knows that Hamas is a terrorist organization, but they have been popular in the Palestinian area because of their welfare distribution system. Their murderous dealings with Israel have been celebrated by the Palestinians.
However, now they will see the true reward for their actions.
Hamas can do two things.....one, they can come around 180 degrees, renounce their violence, accept the right of Israel to exist, and begin governing responsibly. Doing so removes the reason they were elected in the first place....and, if they wish to hold that political power, they will have to maintain relations with Israel. The other option is to maintain their stance where Israel is concerned. Doing that will spell doom, as few nations will continue to fund the ‘Palestinian people’. In addition, Israel will have every right, once that first missile flies over the wall they are rightly building, to declare war and utterly destroy the Palestinian proto-state.
See, the forces that will come to play on Hamas will end up either neutering it or destroying it. The people in that failed area will see what they have wrought, and they will either have the discipline to cast out the idiots they have elected, or they will fall to further Islamofascist violence. Liberty requires that the government be beholden to the people....if Hamas fails in this, it will prove that Bush and Israel were right. If they come around and start acting politically mature, it will show that Bush was right, and Israel will have the security they have desired for 60 years.
So, in short, I think that the Palestinian election is a win-win for the War on Terror, and a long-term win-win for the Bush Doctrine.
Less...
Posted by
John Cross at
09:44 AM |
(0)
Trackbacks
Category:
The Los Angeles Communist Times
The Los Angeles Times, much like the New York Times, and much like the vast majority of academia, the news media, the television and motion picture industry, and first-year college students around the world, never met a communist they didn’t like. In fact, I would say the word “like” is a bit on the weak side. I’d venture to say that “love” or “adore” are more fitting. This point is proven many times over with the continuing praise they have given to Frank Wilkinson, the tried, convicted, and jailed Communist who died a few weeks ago and has since left his mark on the world.
I had never heard of Frank Wilkinson before his death. Popular commies never interested me, and frankly, he’s about as important as a grain of sand on the beach. But apparently, as I found out after about two hours of research, he was one of the most important figures in communist heroism to date. While Marx holds the flag in deceased commies aged over 100 years, Wilkinson just might be the newest hero for the past 50 years, riding along side of Che Guevara, and standing tall with Uncle Fidel Castro. The LA Times summarized the most important part of his life in their extended obituary, “member of the Communist Party for more than 30 years, Wilkinson lost his job at the Los Angeles Housing Authority in the McCarthy era after refusing to answer questions about his political affiliations during a city hearing concerning housing in Chavez Ravine. But he continued his anti-poverty work and was summoned before the House Un-American Activities Committee in 1958.” As you can see, Wilkinson was a man of honor, as any communist is who stands against capitalism so bravely and stands for the working class. It finished with “Rather than assert his 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination, as others did, he refused to answer questions citing the 1st Amendment. His case went to the Supreme Court, where he lost, 5-4. He spent nine months in prison for contempt of Congress.”
Anyone who believes that the United States is not divided is either not paying attention, or they just don’t care. Luckily the division is only apparent, and probably only matters if you’re some sort of political junkie, so the continuing infiltration of communists and socialists in the American mainstream will remain with what I’m guessing to be somewhere near 10 – 15% until the end of time. The only problem is that the commies themselves, as well as the sympathizers and enablers, hold positions of power or high-ranking positions in the American media. Take Jackie Goldberg, who has never met a child rapist, murderer, or pedophile that she didn’t like, who had some shining words for Wilkinson, calling him a man “… who inspired people because he was courageous.” Goldberg, a California Assemblywoman, called for action against landlords who refused to accept sex offenders as renters, citing that it was offensive and not courteous to the sex offenders. This, along with the proposed legislation by her comrade Mark Leno last week, which allowed for pedophiles to have up to 24 articles of child pornography before it would be considered a felony, demonstrates the kind of company that she keeps. A teacher from Culver City brought Wilkinson to speak to the class, noting that he kept the students on the edge of their seats, and that he took over the entire semester. Of course, this was before she could make it to the part where she spoke about how evil Reaganomics was. “He taught them what fear can do to a country. They really listened. Frank took over the semester. We never made it to Reaganomics,’ the teacher said, drawing laughter.”
I was reading an article in some Los Angeles magazine last week, which dove into the history of the Chavez Ravine. For LA natives, the Chavez Ravine now houses Dodger Stadium, the old Los Angeles Police Academy, as a few parks that mostly serve as sets for various television shows and movies. The article talked about Wilkinson in detail, and how he fought against the development of Dodger Stadium, the police academy, and anything else that garnered a profit or served the community. The area, prior to the building of the stadium and academy, became infested with communists who enjoyed the low-rent housing, and was coined “Red Hill” by Angelenos.
Of course, this is not the first, and it will not be the last of the mainstream media’s attraction to dead commies. Expect weeks of coverage when Castro finally kicks the can, with rewrites of history about how well he treated his people, and how no one ever wanted to leave the utopia known as communist Cuba.
Sunday, January 29, 2006
One thing I can say
is - unlike a certain member of the Dasypus sabanicola I could name - I actually provide something of value.
This song fits the description of a capella precisely, in that there are no instruments throughout the entire song. All sound effects were laid onto multiple tracks, made entirely by the artist. Listen carefully and you can hear him doing it all. It’s an enjoyable little ditty, and I hope you enjoy it too.
Right-click to save
Friday, January 27, 2006
Any of you living in or near San Diego
I was stationed there in the early 90s and I remember an establishment out on University called “The Baths” (or something like that), where you could go to rent a sauna/spa facility. I rented this room, which had a little mini sauna (big enough for about 3-4 people, but no more), a small jacuzzi, showers and a massage table.
But I don’t know if it is still there. Anyone know what I’m talking about?
If it isn’t there, does anyone know where we can arrange a co-ed “Spa Day” - that has a whirlpool/jacuzzi, sauna, and offers massage, manicures/pedicures, beauty parlor/barbershop, etc...) down in the San Diego area?
Thursday, January 26, 2006
Odd Quiz Indeed
You are the Plain Meaning Rule! You interpret
statutes according to what an ordinary
speaker of English would understand from the
text. You’re upfront and direct. You claim
that you’re just following the rules, but
often find a clever technicality to interpret
the rules however you want.
Which Canon of Statutory Construction are You?
brought to you by Quizilla
An odd quiz
You are the Plain Meaning Rule! You interpret
statutes according to what an ordinary
speaker of English would understand from the
text. You’re upfront and direct. You claim
that you’re just following the rules, but
often find a clever technicality to interpret
the rules however you want.
Which Canon of Statutory Construction are You?
brought to you by Quizilla
h/t to RNS
Top Gun II: Brokeback Squadron
Aw, c’mon, who among you is actually surprised?
Swallow first
Tip of the noggin-topper to Ace
Breaking Alito News
I’ll update in a bit (I have to get home) but CNN is reporting that John Kerry is calling for a fillibuster on Samuel Alito. It isn’t even a linkable story yet.
I will update as this progresses.
Update(4:37 EST): Here’s a link, thanks to Drudge. Kerry is obviously responding to the Angry Left and the New York Times editorial page from this morning...which may be one and the same.
Update(4:50) Real Clear Politics has it up as well. I’m looking for some punditry from them as well...they are sharp as a tack on these things. UPDATE (6:08): And, HERE IT IS!!
If I can comment.....this looks everything like Kerry trying to build momentum for a possible ‘08 run. He would not do this unless he were trying to call attention to himself from the hard left. Note that even though Hillary does not support Alito, she isn’t making the move to fillibuster him. If it would have been helpful for her aspiration to do that, she would have been the first in line to call for the fillibuster. Now that Kerry’s thrown the gauntlet, so to speak, it will be interesting who sides with him. The article says that Kerry claims Kennedy, and several others (though not listed by name) have sided with him. Also note that he made his proclaimation from Switzerland, and not on the Senate floor.
We’ll see.
Update (5:01) STOP THE ACLU has made an entry on the subject, with a link in his column to The Political Teen
Update (5:13): Michelle Malkin is all over it.
Update (5:24): Since three Democratic Senators have come out in support of Alito....Sen. Ben Nelson of Nebraska, Sen. Robert Byrd of West Virginia and Sen. Tim Johnson of South Dakota...there is only the need to get two more to break the fillibuster (if it comes to that). Also, with Louisiana’s Mary Landrieu coming out against the filibuster, I can’t see Democratic success here. This is a definite break between Kerry and the more moderate (electable) part of the Democratic Party.
Update (5:47): Polipundit is on the air with a link, and a pretty fitting comment.
Update (6:01): So is RightWinged.com
Update (6:10): Fox News is on this...finally. I don’t have to keep hitting CNN for updates. OK...good. I expect some commentary will come later from this very website. I hope some links come over, and we get some new readers. If you are here from a link, welcome!! Stay and read awhile.
Posted by
John Cross at
01:11 PM |
(1)
Trackbacks
Category:
A Bone to Pick
If you think I’m harsh on the Law & Order: SVU franchise (see here and here), just wait until you see what Barry has to say about the FOX show, Bones.
If I had to hypothesize, I would say that Hollywood liberals are trying to rewrite the rules of police work. Either that, or make it so it’s hard to convict bad guys. Or they could be trying to “creatively induce” a permissive society. I don’t know, so just go and read Barry’s entry.
No WMD, eh?
From The Corner at NRO
The man who served as the no. 2 official in Saddam Hussein’s air force says Iraq moved weapons of mass destruction into Syria before the war by loading the weapons into civilian aircraft in which the passenger seats were removed.
None whatsoever, and that guy (the equivalent of the Deputy Chief of Staff for the Air Force - in our military, he would be a 3- or 4-star general, be at every meeting of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and rank among the top ten highest ranking commissioned officers in the whole of the uniformed services) doesn’t know what he’s talking about, does he?
Wednesday, January 25, 2006
Too small for me
I’m a Porsche 911!
You have a classic style, but you’re up-to-date with the latest technology. You’re ambitious, competitive, and you love to win. Performance, precision, and prestige - you’re one of the elite,and you know it.
Take the Which Sports Car Are You? quiz.
I don’t know whether I would even fit....
You have no privacy
None whatsoever. Get used to it.
The moment you were assigned a tracking number by the Government (known here in the US as a “Social Security number”, but by different names elsewhere*), you lost all claim to that privacy. The government keeps track of you through the various institutions that you will interact with as life moves on - schools, hospital visits, immunizations, home address, people you contact and communicate with (including by e-mail), driver’s license, group affiliations, military service, voter registration/affiliation, jobs held, cars/houses owned, taxes paid/owed, income, marriages/divorces/kids/adoptions, bank balance, insurance policies, Social Security, you name it.
If the government really wants to know, they can find out, and nothing you can do or say will stop them.
If the police ask questions and you refuse to cooperate, if they can get a tame judge to agree, you can be thrown in jail on a “material witness” order until you DO cooperate, “right to privacy” be damned. If you remain silent and refuse to even identify yourself, that is already a crime in some states, and you can be thrown in jail until they figure out who you are.
They can dig and dig and ignore the need for warrants or any of that other legal mumbo-jumbo that people depend on.
But the only catch is that if they decide to dig into your life without a warrant, they cannot use any of that data against you in criminal court.
Conversely, if a private individual decides to go digging through your background, finds something incriminating and turns it over to the police, the lack of a warrant is meaningless, since it wasn’t the police that went digging, and the Fifth Fourth Amendment doesn’t protect against private individuals, only the State.
Hell, even here on this site, I point out the IP address you are using (and by which you can be UNIQUELY identified, with odds of making a mistake on the close order of 4.3 billion to 1 against, or you wouldn’t be able to read this). I don’t need a warrant for that information, and every web site out there does exactly the same thing, with many of them quietly stashing “cookies” on your personal computer, which keeps track of your every mouse click.
You have no privacy. Get used to it.
“If you do not wish a thing heard, do not say it. If you do not wish a thing seen, do not do it.”
* - those of you from other countries know what I mean, but please leave a comment telling us which country and how it is referred to in your country. Just for the record, y’see…
Posted by
Drumwaster at
10:02 AM |
(0)
Trackbacks
Category:
Essays |