Drumwaster's Rants

August 2008
S M T W T F S
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

Members:

Login | Register | Member List

Search


Advanced Search

tracker

Archives

August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003

Category Archives

Recent entries

Anyone out there interested in winning some money?
Regarding The California Sales Tax Hike
I’m hearing lots of chatter
I saw this
The Olympics will be the end
Obama Tries to Sell Himself to Evangelicals
I want to know….
Another One Of My Dumb Theories
Man Gets Life for DUI
So…so right

Categories

Syndicate

RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
Atom

All e-mail submissions and comments are subject to publication or parody at the sole discretion of the authors of this site, unless prior arrangements have been made.

Take the MIT Weblog Survey




Chance favors the prepared mind. -- Louis Pasteur


Friday, May 16, 2008


Can’t get the People to agree with you?

Easy solution: find a friendly judge!

Even if you can’t manage to persuade the minimum number necessary to get your policies inculcated into legislation (50%+1 for vox populi Initiatives, or a majority of the Legislature and the Governor), that’s perfectly okay because all you need to do is find a judge that agrees with you and, voila!

You overturn the clear will of 61% of the people.

What could be easier?

Yesterday, a judicial panel of seven judges voted 4-3 to ignore the definition of marriage given in existing black-letter law by finding a “fundamental right” that has gone hitherto unnoticed for a century and a half. The last time this issue came up was Proposition 22, which passed by more than 20 points (61-39), yet those unelected judges ignore that to create a “compelling state interest” in gay marriage. (Which neatly sidesteps the utter lack of legal precedent, as well as the need to actually have any written laws supporting the judges as they attempt to arrive at their various decisions.)

Funny… wouldn’t there be a “compelling state interest” in one man-one woman marriages? After all, that is proven to be the most stable form of family, as well as being self-sufficient in creating future generations (something same-sex couples simply cannot do).

That ticking sound is becoming louder.

Posted by Drumwaster at 05:45 AM |
Page 1 of 1 pages